From 887e9beb9e8fbde198b2c028f29f69e1e6266a57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Albrecht Degering Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 16:52:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] docs: update meta documentation links --- docs/DOCUMENTATION_MAP.md | 6 +++--- docs/EXTERNAL_REFERENCES_AND_INTEGRATION_MATURITY.md | 2 +- docs/GITEA_ISSUES.md | 2 +- docs/GOVOPLAN_MASTER_ROADMAP.md | 6 +++--- docs/MODULE_ARCHITECTURE.md | 2 +- docs/SECURITY_AUDIT.md | 2 +- docs/STATE_AND_RECOVERY_CONTRACT.md | 2 +- 7 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/DOCUMENTATION_MAP.md b/docs/DOCUMENTATION_MAP.md index 710f0ad..128b70d 100644 --- a/docs/DOCUMENTATION_MAP.md +++ b/docs/DOCUMENTATION_MAP.md @@ -43,9 +43,9 @@ operator, and roadmap pages. | Topic | Canonical document | Notes | | --- | --- | --- | | Product roadmap and module routing | `GOVOPLAN_MASTER_ROADMAP.md` | Product-level sequencing, implementation gates, issue routing, and missing-module decisions. | -| Stable platform ideas | `govoplan/docs/PLATFORM_CORE_IDEAS.md` | Cross-product thesis, canonical distinctions, product experience rule, maturity rule, and decision test. | -| Current cross-product reconciliation | `govoplan/docs/STRATEGY_STATUS.md` | The only current prose status source; generated evidence and Gitea remain authoritative inputs. | -| Institutional governance target | `govoplan/docs/INSTITUTIONAL_GOVERNANCE_TARGET_ARCHITECTURE.md` | Cross-product semantic layers, source-authority modes, candidate Mandates/Services/Parties/Decisions boundaries, and migration sequence. | +| Stable platform ideas | `govoplan/docs/strategy/PLATFORM_CORE_IDEAS.md` | Cross-product thesis, canonical distinctions, product experience rule, maturity rule, and decision test. | +| Current cross-product reconciliation | `govoplan/docs/strategy/STRATEGY_STATUS.md` | The only current prose status source; generated evidence and Gitea remain authoritative inputs. | +| Institutional governance target | `govoplan/docs/architecture/INSTITUTIONAL_GOVERNANCE_TARGET_ARCHITECTURE.md` | Cross-product semantic layers, source-authority modes, candidate Mandates/Services/Parties/Decisions boundaries, and migration sequence. | | UI/UX decisions | `UI_UX_DECISION_LEDGER.md` | Binding guided-UI decisions, open decisions, impact index, and review checklist. | | Core interface migration | `INTERFACE_PATTERN_MIGRATION.md` | Core-owned settings, credential, retention, lifecycle, and shared-component evidence for the product pattern language. | | Interface ethics and design doctrine | `INTERFACE_ETHICS_AND_DESIGN_DOCTRINE.md` | Product-level doctrine for context, decision, consequence, contestability, responsibility, and traceability. | diff --git a/docs/EXTERNAL_REFERENCES_AND_INTEGRATION_MATURITY.md b/docs/EXTERNAL_REFERENCES_AND_INTEGRATION_MATURITY.md index 4219d7a..654f101 100644 --- a/docs/EXTERNAL_REFERENCES_AND_INTEGRATION_MATURITY.md +++ b/docs/EXTERNAL_REFERENCES_AND_INTEGRATION_MATURITY.md @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ must not imply that GovOPlaN holds an authoritative copy. Integration maturity states what an adapter is capable of doing. It does not decide which system owns truth for a configured object or field group. A binding separately selects one of the source-authority modes defined by the -[institutional governance target architecture](../../govoplan/docs/INSTITUTIONAL_GOVERNANCE_TARGET_ARCHITECTURE.md): +[institutional governance target architecture](../../govoplan/docs/architecture/INSTITUTIONAL_GOVERNANCE_TARGET_ARCHITECTURE.md): - `native_authoritative` - `external_authoritative` diff --git a/docs/GITEA_ISSUES.md b/docs/GITEA_ISSUES.md index 71dd6cc..7d3dbec 100644 --- a/docs/GITEA_ISSUES.md +++ b/docs/GITEA_ISSUES.md @@ -13,4 +13,4 @@ tools/gitea/gitea-sync-wiki.py --help Canonical documentation: -- `/mnt/DATA/git/govoplan/docs/GITEA_ISSUES.md` +- `/mnt/DATA/git/govoplan/docs/project/GITEA_ISSUES.md` diff --git a/docs/GOVOPLAN_MASTER_ROADMAP.md b/docs/GOVOPLAN_MASTER_ROADMAP.md index dae5584..35a2786 100644 --- a/docs/GOVOPLAN_MASTER_ROADMAP.md +++ b/docs/GOVOPLAN_MASTER_ROADMAP.md @@ -10,15 +10,15 @@ gates. Issues are the active backlog; this document is durable architecture planning context and should be mirrored to the Gitea wiki. The meta repository's -[Connected Governance Platform Roadmap](https://git.add-ideas.de/GovOPlaN/govoplan/src/branch/main/docs/CONNECTED_GOVERNANCE_PLATFORM_ROADMAP.md) +[GovOPlaN Roadmap](https://git.add-ideas.de/GovOPlaN/govoplan/src/branch/main/docs/strategy/ROADMAP.md) describes the corresponding cross-product stakeholder visions, configurable service and operating configurations, connected outcome stories, and capability horizons. The selected five-stage delivery sequence and its gates are in the meta repository's -[Reference Journey Program](https://git.add-ideas.de/GovOPlaN/govoplan/src/branch/main/docs/REFERENCE_JOURNEY_PROGRAM.md). +[Reference Journey Program](https://git.add-ideas.de/GovOPlaN/govoplan/src/branch/main/docs/strategy/REFERENCE_JOURNEY_PROGRAM.md). The semantic target, source-authority modes, and reconciliation with the implemented platform are in the meta repository's -[Institutional Governance Target Architecture](https://git.add-ideas.de/GovOPlaN/govoplan/src/branch/main/docs/INSTITUTIONAL_GOVERNANCE_TARGET_ARCHITECTURE.md). +[Institutional Governance Target Architecture](https://git.add-ideas.de/GovOPlaN/govoplan/src/branch/main/docs/architecture/INSTITUTIONAL_GOVERNANCE_TARGET_ARCHITECTURE.md). Those product documents are canonical; this Core roadmap remains their technical sequencing and module-routing companion. diff --git a/docs/MODULE_ARCHITECTURE.md b/docs/MODULE_ARCHITECTURE.md index 47521f5..b53aa09 100644 --- a/docs/MODULE_ARCHITECTURE.md +++ b/docs/MODULE_ARCHITECTURE.md @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ The experimental remote WebUI bundle loading design is tracked in The cross-product semantic layers, source-authority modes, and candidate Mandates, Services, Parties, and Decisions boundaries are canonical in the meta repository's -[`INSTITUTIONAL_GOVERNANCE_TARGET_ARCHITECTURE.md`](../../govoplan/docs/INSTITUTIONAL_GOVERNANCE_TARGET_ARCHITECTURE.md). +[`INSTITUTIONAL_GOVERNANCE_TARGET_ARCHITECTURE.md`](../../govoplan/docs/architecture/INSTITUTIONAL_GOVERNANCE_TARGET_ARCHITECTURE.md). ## Layer Model diff --git a/docs/SECURITY_AUDIT.md b/docs/SECURITY_AUDIT.md index 7dda59e..0b985b6 100644 --- a/docs/SECURITY_AUDIT.md +++ b/docs/SECURITY_AUDIT.md @@ -12,4 +12,4 @@ tools/checks/security-audit/run.sh --mode full --scope govoplan Canonical documentation: -- `/mnt/DATA/git/govoplan/docs/SECURITY_AUDIT.md` +- `/mnt/DATA/git/govoplan/docs/operations/SECURITY_AUDIT.md` diff --git a/docs/STATE_AND_RECOVERY_CONTRACT.md b/docs/STATE_AND_RECOVERY_CONTRACT.md index e1745c3..30069d6 100644 --- a/docs/STATE_AND_RECOVERY_CONTRACT.md +++ b/docs/STATE_AND_RECOVERY_CONTRACT.md @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ Core does not create production database backups. The deployment owner must provide backup, retention, encryption, restore verification, and recovery-point coordination for PostgreSQL, object storage, and encryption keys. The canonical operator procedure is documented in -`govoplan/docs/RECOVERY_AND_ROLLBACK_GUARANTEES.md`. +`govoplan/docs/operations/RECOVERY_AND_ROLLBACK_GUARANTEES.md`. ## Verification