feat: define governed report provider contract

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-02 05:30:06 +02:00
parent 3c4bcc28f1
commit b58c9c55cf
4 changed files with 420 additions and 2 deletions
+14
View File
@@ -823,6 +823,10 @@ WebUI modules receive only the core route context:
- `auth`
A module should call its own API client and module-owned backend routes. Shared API helpers should live in core only when they are truly platform-level concerns.
For ordinary JSON mutations, use Core's `apiPostJson` and `apiPatchJson`
helpers. They preserve the shared authentication, CSRF, error, and request
invalidation behavior while leaving endpoint types and feature semantics in the
owning module.
Modules can also contribute named UI capabilities for explicit extension
points. Capability values must be narrow, typed contracts, not imports from a
@@ -1005,6 +1009,16 @@ Decision: templates and reporting are separate modules.
and export targets
- report permissions, report execution history, generated report evidence, and
report-specific retention inputs
Cross-module reports use Core's versioned
`reporting.report_provider.<provider-id>` contract. Source modules own
authorization, parameters, source revisions, effective scope, result schema,
and privacy transforms; Reporting owns discovery, validation, governed
execution, provenance, export history, and the global `/reports` route. The
optional `policy.reporting_governance` capability can only tighten execution,
retention, export, and re-identification-risk handling. Reporting exposes
`reporting.retention` so the Policy-owned retention run can minimize expired
provider results without importing Reporting models.
- downstream export handoff to files, dataflow, connectors, or publication
surfaces