GovOPlaN Documentation Map
This directory contains cross-repository product, architecture, release, and operational documentation. The map below defines which document answers which question. A document not listed as the current status source must not present volatile repository, issue, release, or maturity counts as current facts.
Strategy
| Question | Canonical source |
|---|---|
| What are the stable ideas and boundaries of the platform? | Platform Core Ideas |
| What product outcomes should GovOPlaN pursue? | Connected Governance Platform Roadmap |
| Which institutional concepts and owners form the target architecture? | Institutional Governance Target Architecture |
| Which end-to-end proofs should guide implementation? | Reference Journey Program |
| What is the reconciled state now? | Strategy Status |
| Which collected ideas and user stories inform the product direction? | Product Input Register |
The dated Strategic Review explains why the current reset and sequencing were chosen. It is an assessment record, not a second live status page.
Product Architecture
| Topic | Canonical source |
|---|---|
| Product-facing experience and hiding technical module boundaries | Product Experience and Module Boundaries |
| Configurable product areas and task-local tools | Quick Access and Product Areas |
| Federation between autonomous installations | Federated GovOPlaN Architecture |
| Institutional digital twin and continuous assurance | Institutional Digital Twin |
| Assisted and non-digital channels | Assisted and Non-Digital Channels |
| Cross-module temporal, purpose, retention, and institutional-context adoption | govoplan-core/docs/INFORMATION_GOVERNANCE_ADOPTION.md |
| eAkte and digital-record ownership | govoplan-records/docs/EAKTE_ARCHITECTURE.md |
| Data source, definition, and transformation graph | Datasource and Definition Graph Architecture |
| Focused task views | Views Architecture |
| Shared interface patterns | Interface Pattern Language |
Runtime And Delivery
- Module Contracts and Installs
- Platform Control Plane
- Installation and Deployment Architecture
- Kubernetes VM Test Lab
- Deployment Profiles
- Scaling and Multi-Host Deployment
- Recovery and Rollback Guarantees
- Recovery Ledger Adoption
- Package Registry Releases
Evidence And Snapshots
These documents are intentionally dated or pinned. They may remain useful even
after the product changes, but they do not override STRATEGY_STATUS.md.
- Capability and Infrastructure Fit Assessment, pinned to the 2026-07-22 Campaign composition
- Strategic Review 2026-08-05
- Backup and Restore Evidence
- Production Target Handoff
- Target Maturity Evidence Runbook
Machine-readable schemas and evidence files belong beside the document that
defines them. Generated inventories belong in audit-reports/ and should not
be edited manually.
Maintenance Rules
- Gitea issues are the only live work-state source.
STRATEGY_STATUS.mdis the only prose reconciliation of current portfolio state. Refresh it from manifests, inventories, tests, and Gitea; do not copy its counts into durable architecture pages.- Durable documents state decisions, invariants, ownership, and acceptance gates. They link to status and issues for implementation depth.
- Dated assessments retain their original composition and conclusion. Add a snapshot notice rather than silently updating their claims.
- Module-specific behavior and user/admin documentation remain in the owning repository. Meta documentation defines cross-module outcomes and contracts.
- A new strategy document must replace, narrow, or link an existing source; it must not introduce a parallel roadmap.
- The Product Input Register preserves external idea and story notes, but only Gitea issues carry live priority, ownership, and implementation state.