Initial commit, very early alpha
This commit is contained in:
66
README.md
66
README.md
@@ -1,2 +1,66 @@
|
||||
# llm-repro-ui
|
||||
# LLM Reproducibility Harness
|
||||
|
||||
A local Streamlit UI for testing how repeatable OpenAI Chat Completions are when you hold the prompt, context, model, seed, and generation parameters constant.
|
||||
|
||||
The goal is to demonstrate operational reproducibility: identical request payloads, identical outputs, and identical backend metadata where available. It is not a proof that the hosted model is mathematically deterministic.
|
||||
|
||||
## What it records
|
||||
|
||||
Each run writes a JSON bundle under `runs/` containing:
|
||||
|
||||
- exact request payload sent to `v1/chat/completions`
|
||||
- SHA-256 hash of the canonicalized request payload
|
||||
- repeated trial outputs
|
||||
- SHA-256 hash of each output string
|
||||
- `system_fingerprint` returned by the API, when available
|
||||
- returned model id, finish reason, usage, response id, and raw response
|
||||
|
||||
The API key is not stored in bundles.
|
||||
|
||||
## Setup
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python -m venv .venv
|
||||
source .venv/bin/activate # Windows: .venv\Scripts\activate
|
||||
pip install -r requirements.txt
|
||||
cp .env.example .env
|
||||
# Edit .env and set OPENAI_API_KEY, or export it in your shell.
|
||||
streamlit run app.py
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommended first experiment
|
||||
|
||||
Use the default prompt and these settings:
|
||||
|
||||
- model: a dated snapshot, for example `gpt-4.1-mini-2025-04-14`
|
||||
- repetitions: `3` or `5`
|
||||
- seed: `42`
|
||||
- temperature: `0`
|
||||
- top_p: `1`
|
||||
- max_completion_tokens: keep modest, for example `200`
|
||||
- streaming: off; tools: not used by this harness
|
||||
|
||||
Then change only the seed and run again. You should usually see a different output hash while the request hash changes by exactly the seed field.
|
||||
|
||||
## Baseline comparison
|
||||
|
||||
After a run is saved, select it in the sidebar as a baseline and run the same request again. The comparison checks:
|
||||
|
||||
- whether the canonical request hash is identical
|
||||
- whether output hashes are identical in the same order
|
||||
- whether the set of returned system fingerprints is identical
|
||||
|
||||
## Offline verification
|
||||
|
||||
To recompute bundle and output hashes without calling the API:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python verify_bundle.py runs/run_*.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Caveats
|
||||
|
||||
- Hosted LLM reproducibility is best-effort. Matching `seed`, prompt, parameters, and `system_fingerprint` improves repeatability but does not guarantee identical text forever.
|
||||
- Rolling model aliases can change. Use snapshot model identifiers where your account and model family support them.
|
||||
- Longer completions provide more opportunities for divergence.
|
||||
- Tool calls, retrieval, web access, time-dependent prompts, and streaming add more variables. This scaffold deliberately avoids them.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user