Initial commit, very early alpha

This commit is contained in:
2026-06-30 13:39:31 +02:00
parent e17611eda1
commit 08426ea177
9 changed files with 1035 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -1,2 +1,66 @@
# llm-repro-ui
# LLM Reproducibility Harness
A local Streamlit UI for testing how repeatable OpenAI Chat Completions are when you hold the prompt, context, model, seed, and generation parameters constant.
The goal is to demonstrate operational reproducibility: identical request payloads, identical outputs, and identical backend metadata where available. It is not a proof that the hosted model is mathematically deterministic.
## What it records
Each run writes a JSON bundle under `runs/` containing:
- exact request payload sent to `v1/chat/completions`
- SHA-256 hash of the canonicalized request payload
- repeated trial outputs
- SHA-256 hash of each output string
- `system_fingerprint` returned by the API, when available
- returned model id, finish reason, usage, response id, and raw response
The API key is not stored in bundles.
## Setup
```bash
python -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate # Windows: .venv\Scripts\activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
cp .env.example .env
# Edit .env and set OPENAI_API_KEY, or export it in your shell.
streamlit run app.py
```
## Recommended first experiment
Use the default prompt and these settings:
- model: a dated snapshot, for example `gpt-4.1-mini-2025-04-14`
- repetitions: `3` or `5`
- seed: `42`
- temperature: `0`
- top_p: `1`
- max_completion_tokens: keep modest, for example `200`
- streaming: off; tools: not used by this harness
Then change only the seed and run again. You should usually see a different output hash while the request hash changes by exactly the seed field.
## Baseline comparison
After a run is saved, select it in the sidebar as a baseline and run the same request again. The comparison checks:
- whether the canonical request hash is identical
- whether output hashes are identical in the same order
- whether the set of returned system fingerprints is identical
## Offline verification
To recompute bundle and output hashes without calling the API:
```bash
python verify_bundle.py runs/run_*.json
```
## Caveats
- Hosted LLM reproducibility is best-effort. Matching `seed`, prompt, parameters, and `system_fingerprint` improves repeatability but does not guarantee identical text forever.
- Rolling model aliases can change. Use snapshot model identifiers where your account and model family support them.
- Longer completions provide more opportunities for divergence.
- Tool calls, retrieval, web access, time-dependent prompts, and streaming add more variables. This scaffold deliberately avoids them.