Files
govoplan-campaign/docs/ACCESS_EXPLANATION_COVERAGE.md

88 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown

# Campaign Access Explanation Coverage
Campaign access explanations are resource-specific evidence. They inherit the
parent Campaign decision only where the child has no independent grant model,
and they must identify that inheritance explicitly.
## Implemented
- Campaign
- Campaign version
- Campaign delivery job / built message
- Computed Campaign report, identified by Campaign, version, and report kind
- Recipient row, identified by `<version UUID>:<job UUID>`
- Frozen recipient source snapshot, identified by its Campaign-version UUID
- Campaign attachment binding and version-bound frozen attachment resolution
- Persisted validation issue, version-bound review decision, and attachment-policy override
- SMTP, IMAP append, Postbox, and printable-output attempts
- Message action, message-action attempt, and job reconciliation decision
- Campaign share and Core-owned Campaign ownership-transfer record
- Independently user-owned recipient import mapping profile
- Saved recipient import execution, identified by `<version UUID>:<import UUID>`
- Persisted validation, build, execution-snapshot, and review evidence, identified
by `<version UUID>:<artifact kind>`
All persisted child IDs are random UUIDs. Embedded build/review children use a
version UUID plus a random job UUID, so callers cannot enumerate a recipient
index or infer an address. A version mismatch is reported as a stale reference.
Missing and cross-tenant children use the same non-disclosing not-found
provenance. Explanations never include recipient addresses, source rows,
filenames, object locators, transport responses, worker claims, target
snapshots, diagnostic text, or reconciliation notes.
## Permission matrix
| Evidence | Parent boundary | Further restriction |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Recipient row or source snapshot | Campaign read/owner/share | `campaigns:recipient:read` |
| Attachment binding/resolution, validation, review, override | Campaign read/owner/share | Campaign review and `campaigns:diagnostic:read` |
| Delivery status | Campaign read/owner/share | `campaigns:report:read` |
| Transport or worker diagnostics | Campaign read/owner/share | `campaigns:diagnostic:read` |
| Exported delivery evidence | Campaign read/owner/share | `campaigns:report:export` |
| Reconciliation decision | Campaign read/owner/share | Campaign reconcile and diagnostic read |
| Share or ownership transfer | Campaign governance | Campaign share, transfer-participant, group-acceptance, or recovery authority; content access remains a separate decision |
| Import mapping profile | Independent user owner | `campaigns:recipient:import`; no Campaign share is inherited |
| Import execution | Campaign read/owner/share | Recipient read and import authority |
| Persisted protocol artifact | Campaign read/owner/share | Recipient, review, report, diagnostic, or export authority appropriate to the artifact |
Postbox, Mail/IMAP, and printable attempts keep bounded Campaign-owned evidence
after provider acceptance. Their explanation therefore remains available when
an optional provider module is later disabled. A missing attempt reports only
the optional owner and `unavailable_or_hidden`; it does not distinguish absence
from hidden data.
## Optional and unsupported owner boundaries
Reusable templates and template revisions are independently governed by the
optional Templates module; Campaign never treats a Campaign share as a template
grant. Durable export packages are independently governed by the optional
Reporting module. Asking the Campaign provider to explain either class therefore
fails closed with `independently_governed_by_optional_module` and
`unavailable_or_hidden`. The response does not reveal whether the optional
module is absent, the object does not exist, or the caller cannot see it.
Campaign reports generated on demand remain non-persisted, version-bound
resources. Their explanation names the report kind and its Campaign/version
parent, and keeps report read, export, and diagnostic permissions distinct.
Each child explanation must include:
- the child resource identity and current state;
- the parent Campaign and version where applicable;
- whether access is inherited, independently granted, or further restricted;
- effective owner/share/policy provenance;
- missing-module or unavailable-evidence reasons without leaking the hidden
object;
- a stable resource identifier suitable for audit and support links.
Delivery attempts, review decisions, reports, and exports can contain more
sensitive evidence than the Campaign summary. Their read and diagnostic/export
permissions therefore remain independently enforceable even when the parent
Campaign is readable.
Import explanations include only the stable import identity, source type,
opaque source identity, source revision, and whether additional provenance was
recorded. They never return imported rows, filenames, column mappings, or source
metadata. Mapping-profile explanations expose only non-reversible header
fingerprints and shape information; headers and mappings remain hidden.