240 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
240 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
# eAkte Architecture
|
|
|
|
## Purpose
|
|
|
|
The eAkte is the authoritative institutional record context for a matter,
|
|
procedure, subject, project, or responsibility. It answers what belongs to the
|
|
record, how it is structured, why an item was filed, which version was known,
|
|
who may use it for which purpose, when it closes, what must be retained, and
|
|
how it is offered, transferred, preserved, or disposed.
|
|
|
|
GovOPlaN Records should provide this governance lifecycle natively while being
|
|
able to place it over an external DMS, records system, long-term archive, or
|
|
specialist procedure. It must not duplicate all document editing or storage.
|
|
|
|
Implementation is tracked in
|
|
[Records #1](https://git.add-ideas.de/GovOPlaN/govoplan-records/issues/1).
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Status
|
|
|
|
The native foundation and governed lifecycle are implemented through the work
|
|
packages tracked by Records #2-#6:
|
|
|
|
- versioned file plans and record classes;
|
|
- stable records, immutable revisions, volumes, exact record items, and
|
|
chronology;
|
|
- tenant isolation, optimistic concurrency, replay-safe writes, independent
|
|
valid/recorded time, purpose capture, institutional context, and search;
|
|
- a full-height eAkte workspace with file plan, list, details, chronology,
|
|
temporal status, create/edit, and filing actions;
|
|
- a provider-neutral Core filing contract with exact Files-version,
|
|
Cases-revision, Forms-submission, and formal-Decision providers;
|
|
- governed close/reopen transitions, class-bound retention calculation,
|
|
effective-dated holds, appraisal, evidence-bound disposition proposals, and
|
|
mandatory independent approval before finalization;
|
|
- archive-neutral transfer manifests and bounded receipts, plus an explicitly
|
|
non-conformant simulation provider that never claims custody;
|
|
- durable recovery-ledger fences for every API write, atomic domain/checkpoint
|
|
commits, Audit events, source-revision revalidation, transfer-manifest
|
|
checksum checks, and an operator recovery-evidence view;
|
|
- tenant administration for versioned file-plan nodes and record classes,
|
|
explicit volume management, and lifecycle controls in the eAkte workspace.
|
|
|
|
The remaining boundary is intentionally visible rather than implied: Records
|
|
#7 requires selection and target testing of an archive/xdomea endpoint and
|
|
conformance profile; #8 completes the cross-module reference journey and
|
|
production evidence. Restricted per-record access grants also remain a
|
|
dedicated access-policy slice. Destruction is represented only as an approved
|
|
pending state; no content deletion or real archive effect is currently
|
|
claimed.
|
|
|
|
## Ownership Boundary
|
|
|
|
Records owns:
|
|
|
|
- file plans and record classes;
|
|
- record, volume, process/file, and record-item identity;
|
|
- classification, filing decision, ordering, and relationship to a case or
|
|
other institutional context;
|
|
- effective retention rule application, closure, hold, appraisal,
|
|
disposition proposal, approval, transfer, and destruction evidence;
|
|
- authoritative record metadata and exact content/reference manifests;
|
|
- external records-system mappings and source-authority mode;
|
|
- export, transfer, archive-offer, and custody receipts.
|
|
|
|
Records does not own:
|
|
|
|
- file bytes, versions, previews, or malware handling (Files);
|
|
- collaborative document editing, check-in/check-out, document review, or DMS
|
|
provider behavior (DMS and connector owner);
|
|
- generated document definitions (Templates);
|
|
- case lifecycle (Cases), work coordination (Workflow Engine/Tasks), formal
|
|
outcomes (Decisions), or general audit events (Audit);
|
|
- generic retention and access policy authoring (Policy);
|
|
- archive preservation implementation or evidence-renewal cryptography
|
|
(external archive/TR-ESOR provider and Encryption/Identity Trust).
|
|
|
|
## Core Object Model
|
|
|
|
| Object | Meaning |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| File plan | Versioned hierarchy derived from institutional responsibilities |
|
|
| Record class | Rules for required metadata, allowed content, access, retention, closure, and disposition |
|
|
| Record | Stable legal/institutional record identity and context |
|
|
| Volume/part | Bounded subdivision for size, period, classification, or custody |
|
|
| Process/file | Optional business transaction grouping inside a record |
|
|
| Record item | Immutable filing event linking exact content or an external object revision |
|
|
| Filing note | Reason, source, relationship, ordering, actor/capacity, and evidence for inclusion |
|
|
| Hold | Effective-dated suspension of disposition with authority and scope |
|
|
| Appraisal | Archive value/offer decision and responsible archive interaction |
|
|
| Disposition case | Proposed retain, transfer, destroy, or reclassify action with review and evidence |
|
|
| Transfer package | Exact metadata/content manifest, profile, digest, encryption, and receipts |
|
|
| Custody event | Handoff, acceptance, rejection, correction, return, or destruction observation |
|
|
|
|
Every object carries tenant/institution, valid and recorded time, revision,
|
|
source authority, classification, purpose constraints, retention/hold state,
|
|
institutional context, provenance, and optimistic-concurrency token.
|
|
|
|
## Record Lifecycle
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
planned -> open -> closed -> retention_running -> appraisal_due
|
|
| |
|
|
v v
|
|
held offered_to_archive
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------------------------+------------------+
|
|
v v v
|
|
accepted rejected retained
|
|
| | |
|
|
v v v
|
|
transferred disposal_due reappraise
|
|
|
|
|
v
|
|
destroyed
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Reopening creates a governed transition and preserves the preceding retention
|
|
schedule. A later closure only restarts retention under an explicit
|
|
administrator action. A hold preserves reason, authority, scope, effective
|
|
interval, policy references, and release evidence. Holds block proposal,
|
|
approval finalization, packaging, and dispatch. A destruction approval changes
|
|
the record to `destruction_pending`; no source object or content is deleted.
|
|
An unapproved disposition can be withdrawn through a new immutable revision so
|
|
a corrected proposal can supersede it. An approved disposition cannot use this
|
|
correction path.
|
|
|
|
## Filing Semantics
|
|
|
|
- Filing links an exact immutable document/file/object revision; a later source
|
|
revision is a new record item unless the record class permits an explicitly
|
|
tracked living reference.
|
|
- The item records valid time of the represented fact and recorded time of
|
|
filing independently.
|
|
- The current security context always controls browsing, including historical
|
|
views.
|
|
- Purpose-aware access may be narrower than ordinary read permission and can
|
|
require case assignment, represented function, mandate, legal basis, or
|
|
reason-for-access capture.
|
|
- A record item can reference a message, decision, form submission, report,
|
|
dataset materialization, external DMS object, physical item, or paper scan;
|
|
it is not limited to Files.
|
|
- Corrections and replacements link items and retain what was previously part
|
|
of the record.
|
|
|
|
## Native, External, And Hybrid Operation
|
|
|
|
| Mode | GovOPlaN behavior |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| Native authoritative | Records owns lifecycle and manifests; Files or object storage owns bytes |
|
|
| External authoritative | External eAkte/DMS owns structure and lifecycle; GovOPlaN keeps governed references and provider state |
|
|
| External mirror | GovOPlaN keeps a read/search projection and immutable evidence snapshots |
|
|
| Governed sync | Explicit metadata/filing fields can change on both sides with revision and conflict rules |
|
|
| Governance overlay | GovOPlaN owns case/workflow/policy/evidence around records held externally |
|
|
| Linked reference | Only stable identity, display metadata, authority, and launch link are retained |
|
|
|
|
The mode is configurable by tenant, record class, provider binding, and where
|
|
safe by field group. A migration assesses exact objects and receipts; enabling
|
|
a connector never silently copies all records.
|
|
|
|
## Standards And Provider Profiles
|
|
|
|
The domain contract remains neutral, while German public-sector deployments
|
|
can add profiles for:
|
|
|
|
- `xdomea` exchange of files, processes, documents, file plans, and
|
|
disposition messages. The IT-Planungsrat decision defines xdomea for
|
|
inter-authority exchange and disposition scenarios:
|
|
<https://www.it-planungsrat.de/beschluss/beschluss-2017-39>
|
|
- archive offering and transfer guidance from the Bundesarchiv, including
|
|
xdomea and XAIP/LXAIP packages:
|
|
<https://www.bundesarchiv.de/unterlagen-abgeben/aussonderung-von-unterlagen/elektronische-akten/>
|
|
- BSI TR-03125/TR-ESOR evidence preservation and archive information packages
|
|
where cryptographic evidentiary value must be maintained:
|
|
<https://www.bsi.bund.de/dok/TR-03125>
|
|
- provider-specific DMS/VBS, archive, and specialist-procedure adapters through
|
|
the standard external-provider declaration and recovery gate.
|
|
|
|
A profile declares supported operations, conformance version, metadata
|
|
mapping, content formats, evidence behavior, size limits, retries, conflicts,
|
|
and target-tested provider. Naming a standard is not a conformance claim.
|
|
|
|
## UI Model
|
|
|
|
The normal record workspace contains:
|
|
|
|
- file-plan tree and saved institutional contexts;
|
|
- record list with class, subject, responsibility, state, retention, holds,
|
|
source, and access explanation;
|
|
- one record surface with metadata, chronology, structured contents, related
|
|
case/service/decision/work, access reason, and evidence;
|
|
- filing action available from owner modules without exposing Records internals;
|
|
- close, reopen, hold, appraisal, transfer, and disposition workflows with
|
|
consequence preview;
|
|
- temporal current/at/all browsing, while clearly separating valid and recorded
|
|
time;
|
|
- search and export that honor current access, purpose, sealed content, and
|
|
minimization.
|
|
|
|
Technical provider IDs, hashes, package schemas, and source mappings remain
|
|
available in an evidence/details view.
|
|
|
|
## Recovery And Scale
|
|
|
|
- PostgreSQL is the durable record-state authority; content uses shared object
|
|
storage or an external provider, never node-local paths.
|
|
- Every external filing, transfer, or destruction uses intent-before-effect,
|
|
idempotency, durable receipts, outcome-unknown state, and reconciliation.
|
|
- Native Records API writes use a per-resource distributed lease and the Core
|
|
recovery ledger. Immutable revision, chronology, Audit projection, and the
|
|
terminal checkpoint commit atomically.
|
|
- Backup evidence binds record rows, object manifests, provider mappings,
|
|
policy/configuration versions, and key references.
|
|
- Restore verifies content digests, missing keys/objects, provider reachability,
|
|
and disposition holds before reopening effects.
|
|
- Automated evidence tests prove that terminal Records operations and their
|
|
hash chain remain verifiable after a database backup/restore round trip. An
|
|
outcome-unknown transfer is persisted as non-retryable and cannot advance
|
|
custody or record disposition state.
|
|
- Search indexes are rebuildable projections and cannot become record
|
|
authority.
|
|
|
|
## Delivery Order
|
|
|
|
1. Persist file plans, record classes, records, record items, exact references,
|
|
chronology, permissions, temporal reads, institutional context, and search.
|
|
2. Integrate filing from Cases, Forms Runtime, Decisions, Campaign/Postbox,
|
|
Files, and Reporting. **Cases, Forms Runtime, Decisions, and Files are
|
|
implemented; Campaign/Postbox and Reporting remain.**
|
|
3. Add closure, retention calculation, holds, appraisal, and reviewed
|
|
disposition without destructive provider effects. **Implemented.**
|
|
4. Add native transfer packages and one target-tested xdomea/archive provider.
|
|
Native packaging and simulation are implemented; target selection/testing
|
|
remains external.
|
|
5. Add destruction/recovery, TR-ESOR provider integration, migration, and
|
|
signed reference-journey evidence.
|
|
|
|
The first reference package should file the digital and assisted variants of
|
|
the same service-to-decision journey into equivalent records and prove search,
|
|
historical reconstruction, hold, transfer, restore, and access explanation.
|