govoplan/docs/STRATEGY_STATUS.md

GovOPlaN Strategy Status

Status Record

Field	Value
Reconciled on	2026-08-06
Source scope	Local workspace manifests, source inventory, focused journey checks, signed release evidence, and live Gitea issue state
Stable direction	Platform Core Ideas and Connected Governance Platform Roadmap
Delivery source	Gitea issues

This is the only prose source for current cross-product status. It is a reconciliation, not a release certification. Module manifests and target evidence remain authoritative for specific maturity claims.

Portfolio Snapshot

• 65 source module manifests were loadable and architecture-declared.
• 47 modules declared vertical_slice; 18 declared scaffold.
• No module declared reference_ready, supported, or lts.
• The live portfolio had 133 open issues, including 39 priority-P1 items.
• 117 open issues had no milestone, so issue labels do not yet express a reliable completion sequence on their own.
• Three product package manifests existed: governed communication, governed data and assurance, and service to decision. None had crossed the complete target-evidence gate.

These counts are dated. Refresh them rather than copying them into another document.

Interface And Contract Evidence

The 2026-08-05 source inventory found:

• 1,247 UI fields and 1,220 UI actions;
• 7,929 stable interface declarations with no duplicate IDs;
• 39 frontend routes and 872 backend endpoints;
• no public WebUI surfaces missing runtime declarations;
• no stale runtime route declarations;
• no unclassified endpoint without a static UI reference;
• all 1,247 fields with a resolvable F1 context; 1,087 remain candidates for richer field-specific content beyond page/module fallback;
• German (de) as the complete reference locale and no used key missing from the required German or English catalogs;
• 260 module information-governance dimensions classified as contract_only. This is an honest platform-wide baseline, not a claim that temporal, purpose, retention, and institutional-context adoption is complete.

Credible Current Outcomes

Platform foundation

Module discovery, optional dependency validation, migrations, shared WebUI, tenant and access foundations, signed catalogs/packages, event delivery, recovery contracts, contextual help, views, temporal titlebar context, and stateless-runtime patterns are implemented and tested at varying depths.

Governed communication

Campaign authoring, recipient data, attachments, templates, mail profiles, mock/real delivery paths, audit evidence, reporting, distribution-list composition, and optional Postbox delivery form the deepest product cluster. Target provider, accessibility, recovery, and high-volume evidence still prevent a reference-ready claim.

Institutional service and decision

Services, Forms, Forms Runtime, Cases, Parties, Mandates, Approvals, Committee, Voting, Decisions, Portal, Postbox, and Audit have an executable service-to- decision fixture. Public and invitation intake can retain Files-backed evidence; Forms submissions, Cases, and formal Decisions can be explicitly filed as exact eAkte source revisions and reconstructed through permission- rechecked native Search projections. Browser-complete assisted intake, resumable work guidance, production identity and delivery, a named archive profile, and target evidence remain.

Governed data and assurance

Connectors, Datasources, Dataflow, Reporting, Search, Policy, Risk Compliance, and Workflow provide source governance, immutable snapshots, transformation, quality, semantic reporting, and provenance foundations. The monthly-data and sanctions journeys still need real connectors, complete interactive reconciliation, publication/export, and guided handoff evidence.

Material Gaps

Gap	Consequence	Next proof
No reference-ready product package	The platform cannot yet make a bounded supported-product claim	Complete one named target composition and evidence bundle
Human-work spine incomplete	Users still navigate modules and remember unfinished work	Task/work inbox, resumable guided journey, deadlines and handoffs
Records/eAkte target integration incomplete	Native lifecycle, retention, holds, approval, recovery, and transfer simulation are implemented, but real custody is not proved	Target-test one archive/xdomea profile and complete the assisted reference journey
Cross-cutting governance adoption uneven	Historical and purpose-sensitive behavior varies by module	Enforced adoption declarations and route/query/effect migration
Explicit help/accessibility depth incomplete	German/reference and F1 association gates now pass, but generic fallback remains too common	High-risk German help content and browser/a11y matrix
Real federation absent	Cross-institution exchange remains connector-specific	Paired-instance signed exchange and reconciliation proof
External production evidence incomplete	Scale, restore, interoperability and custody claims remain conditional	Real target drills and independent signed evidence

Active Strategic Order

1. Establish German, help, temporal, purpose, retention, and institutional context as enforceable platform quality contracts.
2. Complete governed communication and Postbox against a named target.
3. Complete the monthly-data flow and use it as the data foundation for sanctions screening.
4. Complete the browser and resumable-work proof for the digital and assisted service-to-decision journey with its existing exact eAkte filing contracts.
5. Extend native PostgreSQL search coverage from the implemented service-to- decision objects to the communication and monthly-data journeys; keep OpenSearch optional.
6. Prove one external product connector and one GovOPlaN federation exchange.
7. Finish multi-host, restore, provider, accessibility, and independent signed target evidence before increasing maturity claims.

Refresh Procedure

Refresh this page only from evidence:

1. run tools/checks/check-manifest-shapes.py;
2. run tools/inventory/platform-interface-inventory.py --strict --strict-declarations --strict-endpoints;
3. run the selected reference-journey checks;
4. inspect signed release and target evidence;
5. query live Gitea issue/milestone state;
6. update the dated values and material gaps here;
7. retain prior assessments as dated evidence rather than rewriting them.