Files
govoplan-docs/docs/INSTANCE_AWARE_DOCUMENTATION.md
2026-07-14 13:22:11 +02:00

3.7 KiB

Instance-Aware Documentation

The docs module renders documentation for the current GovOPlaN instance instead of showing a static product manual.

Inputs

The documentation context is built from:

  • enabled module manifests
  • frontend routes and navigation metadata
  • module permissions and the current principal's granted scopes
  • documentation topics contributed by manifests
  • runtime documentation providers contributed by modules
  • optional dependencies and declared capabilities

Layers

Layer Meaning
always Generic platform concepts that are useful in every deployment.
configured Documentation for installed modules/features visible in this instance.
available Installed features hidden by missing permissions or unmet conditions.
evidence Hints for unavailable optional modules, missing capabilities, or external evidence sources.

Normal user documentation should emphasize always and configured content. Admin documentation may show all layers plus route, permission, module, and capability diagnostics.

Conditions

Documentation topics can declare:

  • required modules
  • any-of module sets
  • modules that must be absent
  • required capabilities
  • required scopes
  • any-of scope sets
  • related configuration keys

The API returns both a human-readable reason and structured blockers:

{
  "reason": "missing modules: mail; missing scopes: mail:profile:read",
  "blockers": {
    "modules": ["mail"],
    "capabilities": [],
    "scopes": ["mail:profile:read"]
  }
}

The WebUI must display the reason and, when present, the blocker lists. This prevents dead-end instructions: users see whether a feature is unavailable because a module is missing, a capability is not registered, or their current permissions do not expose it.

Module Guidance

Module docs should not hard-code assumptions about sibling modules. A module should contribute conditional topics such as:

  • "Send selected file by mail" requiring files and mail
  • "Campaign attachments from storage" requiring campaigns and files
  • "Mailbox diagnostics" requiring mail.devMailbox

The docs module remains the renderer. Feature modules own their subject matter and describe unlocks through manifest metadata.

Ownership And Disclosure Rules

The ownership rule is the same for all documentation layers: the module or repository that owns the behavior owns the durable explanation. The docs module owns classification, filtering, search, route contribution, and rendering. It does not own feature-module business rules, policy semantics, or current issue state.

Use these sources for these purposes:

Source Purpose
Runtime docs providers Effective, actor-aware explanation of the configured system.
Repository docs Durable architecture, module contracts, runbooks, and governance decisions.
Synced Gitea wiki pages Published copy of durable documentation for browsing and linking.
Gitea issues Active backlog state, acceptance criteria, blockers, and closure evidence.

Runtime docs may link to issues when an unavailable feature is planned or a known limitation is relevant, but the UI must label that link as active work. It must not treat open issues as shipped behavior.

Safe disclosure is evaluated before a topic is returned. Missing permission, missing module, and missing capability explanations should be useful but minimal. User docs explain the blocker and who can resolve it. Admin docs can include route ids, scopes, capability names, configuration keys, and policy provenance only when the actor has permission to inspect those details. Secrets, tokens, private keys, credentials, raw policy payloads, and unrelated personal data are never returned as documentation content.